The number of pages within the document is: 12
The self-declared author(s) is/are:
Maria Baquero
The subject is as follows:
Original authors did not specify.
The original URL is: LINK
The access date was:
2019-02-09 15:58:26.458959
Please be aware that this may be under copyright restrictions. Please send an email to admin@pharmacoengineering.com for any AI-generated issues.
Loading...
Reload document 
Open in new tab The content is as follows:
Thessaloniki Forum of Airport Charges Regulators November 2018 1 Non – Discrimination under the Airport Charges Directive Introduction 1.1 The goal of the Aviation Strategy is to strengthen the competitiveness and sustainability of the entire EU air transport value network. 1 Tackling limits to growth in the air and on the ground, in particular by boosting the efficiency of airport services, is one of the three key priorities that the Commission has identified. 1.2 The Thessaloniki Forum of Airport Charges Regulators is tasked wi th 1) working on and making recommendations for a better common implementation of the Directive 2009/12/EC on Airport Charges (the “ACD”) and 2) promoting best practices in economic regulation of airports . 2 3 The ACD requires Member States to assign respon sibility for supervising the setting of airport charges to Independent Supervisory 1.3 Charging strategies of all airports subject to the ACD must be Non – Discriminatory. The charging strategy must therefore be justifiable in accordance w ith the ACD, in a way which is relevant, objective, and transparent. Variation in airport charges may be due to cost relatedness, service quality or scope, or other justifications such as incentivising efficient behaviour . The charging strategy should be c onsulted on as per Article 6 of the ACD. 1.4 In this paper, the Forum first provide s recommendations on Non – Discrimination in the context of the charging strategy of airport s . 1.5 The forum then set s out an example of an effective process for investigating a complaint relating to discrimination . 1.6 The se recommendations have been formulated by the Working Group of the Thessaloniki Forum on Airport Charges, taking into consideration the views of representatives of the airport and airline communities. Members of the working group are Belgium, Denmark, Franc e, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. 1.7 This report has been adopted by the Thessaloniki Forum on 23 November 2018. 1 ec.europa.eu/transport/modes/air/aviation – strategy_en 2 eur – lex.europa.eu/legal – content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32009L0012&from=EN 3 Throughout this document: Airport refers to the Airport Managing Body or the A irport Authority. User or Airline refers to airlines operating or planning to operate at the airport during the period in which the charges being consulted on will be applicable (airlines planning to operate should formally notify the airport of this inten tion prior to the consultation). ISA refers to the Independent Supervisory Authority referred to in the Airport Charges Directive and designated by the individual Member State.
Please note all content on this page was automatically generated via our AI-based algorithm (PaJltaRIk9IBQ4i4sI1i). Please let us know if you find any errors.