Here is your PDF: Psychological, social and sexual consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): a systematic review of quantitative studies ; Keywords: review knowledge centre studies systematic consequences þ

The number of pages within the document is: 79

The self-declared author(s) is/are:
Rigmor C Berg

The subject is as follows:
Original authors did not specify.

The original URL is: LINK

The access date was:
2019-02-10 22:32:43.301305

Please be aware that this may be under copyright restrictions. Please send an email to admin@pharmacoengineering.com for any AI-generated issues.

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

The content is as follows:
Background: In November 2008, the Norwegian Knowledge Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies (NKVTS) commissioned the Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services (NOKC) to conduct a systematic review about the consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C). The review would answer the question: What are the psychological, social and sexual consequences of FGM/C? Methods: We searched systematically for relevant literature in international scienti Þ c da- tabases, in databases of international organisations that are engaged in aspects related to FGM/C, and in reference lists of relevant reviews and included studies. We also communicated with professionals working with FGM/C related issues. We selected studies according to pre-speci Þ ed criteria, appraised the methodolo- gical quality using checklists, and summarized the study level results using ta- bles and calculated effect estimates (risk ratio and mean difference) in addition to performing meta-analyses to estimate effect. We applied the instrument GRA- DE to assess the extent to which we could have con Þ dence in the effect estima- tes. Results: We included and summarized results from 17 comparative Psychological, social and sexual consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): a systematic review of quantitative studies Report from Kunnskapssenteret (Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services) No 13Œ2010 Systematic review (continued)

Please note all content on this page was automatically generated via our AI-based algorithm (L6d0OHyAQQgIQGQFaHWg). Please let us know if you find any errors.