Here is your pdf: Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication

The length of the document below is: 22 page(s) long

The self-declared author(s) is/are:

www.sagepub.com

The subject is as follows:
Subject: Original authors did not specify.

The original URL is: LINK

The access date was:
Access date: 2019-04-10 13:35:29.120032

Please be aware that this may be under copyright restrictions. Please send an email to admin@pharmacoengineering.com for any AI-generated issues.

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

The content is as follows:

1Ambiguity as Strategy inOrganizational CommunicationWritten more than two decades ago, this essay was my first attempt to counter

the prevailing ideology of clarity and openness in organizational communication

theory and research that stood in sharp contrast to most people’s experience of

organizational life. Cited hundreds of times in the fields of Communication and

Organizational Studies, this essay identified four functions of strategic ambiguity—

specifically, its capacity to promote unified diversity, to preserve privileged posi-

tions, to foster deniability, and to facilitate organizational change. The discussion of

plausible deniability foreshadowed a central theme of the Iran-Contra hearings,

during which an American Lieutenant Colonel (Oliver North) testified to the U.S.

Congress about the role and importance of “plausible deniability” in the illegal sale

of weapons to the Nicaraguan Contras. The lack of serious consequences for the

Colonel or anyone else connected to the case showed the power as well as the poten-

tial for abuse inherent in this kind of communication.In retrospect, this essay reflects my youthful desire to edify and explore the more

mysterious and less rational aspects of human connection (I was 23 when I began

work on it and 26 when it was published). In focusing on these things, I paid little

attention to other dynamics, such as how ambiguity can mask and sustain abuses of

power. Looking back, I am also unsure about my relational definition of strategic

ambiguity; it seemed to make sense at the time, but has proven difficult to study.

Nevertheless, the paper accomplished what I had hoped it would, prompting schol-

ars and practitioners alike to reflect on their assumptions about the centrality of

Please note all content on this page was automatically generated via our AI-based algorithm (BishopKingdom ID: 0zDbzKycU5N03c1gI0pQ). Please let us know if you find any errors.